In the midst of these contemplations I thought back to my days in News Literacy freshman year in which we discussed the consequences journalist Stephan Glass faced after he was exposed for writing fraudulent articles during most of his time at The New Republic . Most of the stories he created on the spot and were derivatives of his own memory, yet he still convinced some of the best editors in the business and much of the public that these pieces were indeed true. It was amazing to learn how when we are held to a certain level of professionalism and knowhow we can potentially bypass so many systems that are designed and set up to prevent said mishaps from occurring. Relating this back to the article that Hample wrote, perhaps the editors and publishers with whom Glass was working with should have asked him to revise and edit the pieces which he submitted week after week more than one time as Hample suggests. In doing so, then likely the inconsistencies in his stories would have been realized sooner and saved the paper from the embarrassment they received when Vanity Fair brought this expose to light. However, it could’ve only allowed Glass to further perfect his dishonest capabilities and push the envelope even further.